Sec 75 of cgst
Web10 Mar 2024 · Published Mar 10, 2024. + Follow. Section 75 (2) of the CGST Act is being reproduced for the sake of ready reference :-. 75 (2) Where any Appellate Authority or … WebSection 75 Section 74 – Determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised by reason of fraud or any wilfulmisstatement or suppression of facts CGST ACT 2024
Sec 75 of cgst
Did you know?
Web19 Mar 2024 · (1) Where a taxable person who––This section declares the offences that attract penalty as a consequence, apart from the requirement to pay the tax and applicable interest In other words, the first sub-section (1) prescribes 21 types of offences, any one of which, if committed, can attract penalty of ten thousand rupees or equal to the amount of … Web10 Oct 2024 · Section 76 of GST – Tax collected but not paid to Government. Everything you want to know about GST Section 76. In this section you may find all details for “Tax …
Web28 Dec 2024 · Explanation added in Section 75 (12) of CGST Act vide Finance Act, 2024 is to clarify that tax on self-declared supplies by registered person in GSTR-1, which has not been paid through GSTR-3B, will be considered as his self-assessed (& admitted) liability & can be recovered. Web(1) Where it appears to the proper officer that any tax has not been paid or short paid or erroneously refunded, or where input tax credit has been wrongly availed or utilised for any reason, other than the reason of fraud or any wilful-misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax, he shall serve notice on the person chargeable with tax …
Web(1) Where the service of notice or issuance of order is stayed by an order of a court or Appellate Tribunal, the period of such stay shall be excluded in computing the period …
Web7 Jan 2024 · Sub-section (12) of section 75 of the CGST Act, 2024 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) provides that notwithstanding anything contained in section 73 or section 74 of …
WebSection 75 – General provisions relating to determination of tax CGST ACT 2024 (1) Where the service of notice or issuance of order is stayed by an order of a court or Appellate … ryan reynolds free guy glassesWebthe appropriate period in terms of Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with sec.14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004; 4.6 I impose penalty of Rs. 18,01,047/-(Rupees Eighteen Lakh One Thousand Forty-seven) only in terms of Rule 15(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 as is ecg cardiologyWeb10 Oct 2024 · This section makes it obligatory on every person who has collected from any other person any amount representing “tax under this Act”, to pay the said amount to the credit of the Central or State Government regardless of whether the supplies in respect of which the amount was collected are taxable or not. is ecg covered by intellicareWeb5 Mar 2024 · (1) Every person who is liable to pay tax in accordance with the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, but fails to pay the tax or any part thereof to the Government within the period prescribed shall for the period for which the tax or any part thereof remains unpaid, pay, on his own, interest at such rate, not exceeding eighteen … ryan reynolds full body imageWeb(1) Where the service of notice or issuance of order is stayed by an order of a court or Appellate Tribunal, the period of such stay shall be excluded in computing the period specified in sub-sections (2) and (10) of section 73 or sub-sections (2) and (10) of section 74, as the case may be. ryan reynolds frenchWeb1 day ago · 3.1 The A.O. after considering the above reply of the assessee observed that assessee has no reasonable cause for receiving an amount of Rs.15.70 lakhs in cash in violation of section 269SS of the Act. In view of this, he levied penalty of Rs.15.70 lakhs, which is equal to the amount of cash received by assessee i.e. Rs.15.70 lakhs. ryan reynolds free cityWeb1 day ago · The impugned order of the CESTAT allowed the appeal of the respondent and set aside the order in original dated 02/05/2024, passed by the Principal Commissioner of the GST which has made a demand of service tax amounting to Rs.75,22,81,847/- for the period 1st July, 2012 to 31st March, 2015 under Section 73 (2) of the Finance Act, 1994, … ryan reynolds funny faces